Test re-scan message

[danenania]

Testing re-scan instructions in PR review comment

[promptfoo-scanner-staging]

👍 All Clear

I reviewed this PR for LLM security vulnerabilities across the six defined vulnerability classes (Prompt Injection, Data Exfiltration, Secrets/PII in Prompts, Insecure Output Handling, Excessive Agency, and Jailbreak Risks). The PR adds a test file with traditional command injection code, but there is no LLM involvement in the code changes.

_{Minimum severity threshold for this scan: 🟡 Medium | Learn more}

---

_{Was this helpful?  👍 Yes  |  👎 No} 

[danenania]

@promptfoo-scanner-staging

[promptfoo-scanner-staging]

👍 All Clear

I reviewed this PR for LLM security vulnerabilities across all six classes (Prompt Injection, Data Exfiltration, PII/Secrets in Prompts, Insecure Output Handling, Excessive Agency, and Jailbreak Risks). The PR adds a test file with a command injection vulnerability, but this is a traditional security issue with no connection to LLM functionality.

_{Minimum severity threshold for this scan: 🟡 Medium | Learn more
To re-scan after making changes, comment @promptfoo-scanner on this PR.}

---

_{Was this helpful?  👍 Yes  |  👎 No} 

[danenania]

@promptfoo-scanner-staging

[danenania]

@promptfoo-scanner-staging

[promptfoo-scanner-staging]

👍 All Clear

This PR adds a test file with a traditional command injection vulnerability, but contains no LLM-related code or data flows. Since this is an LLM-specific security scanner, no LLM security vulnerabilities were identified.

_{Minimum severity threshold for this scan: 🟡 Medium
To re-scan after making changes, comment @promptfoo-scanner on this PR.
Learn more about code scanning}

---

_{Was this helpful?  👍 Yes  |  👎 No} 

[danenania]

@promptfoo-scanner-staging

[promptfoo-scanner-staging]

👍 All Clear

This PR adds a test file with traditional command injection vulnerability, but contains no LLM-related code or functionality. The scanner focuses exclusively on LLM-specific security issues.

_{Minimum severity threshold for this scan: 🟡 Medium | To re-scan after making changes, comment @promptfoo-scanner on this PR
Learn more about code scanning}

---

_{Was this helpful?  👍 Yes  |  👎 No} 

[danenania]

@promptfoo-scanner-staging

[promptfoo-scanner-staging]

👍 All Clear

This PR adds a test file (test-vuln.js) that contains a traditional command injection vulnerability. However, this scanner focuses exclusively on LLM security vulnerabilities. The command injection issue exists in standard Node.js code with no LLM involvement—no LLM API calls, prompt construction, or agent interactions were found.

_{Minimum severity threshold: 🟡 Medium | To re-scan after changes, comment @promptfoo-scanner
Learn more about code scanning}

---

_{Was this helpful?  👍 Yes  |  👎 No} 

[danenania]

@promptfoo-scanner-staging

[promptfoo-scanner-staging]

👍 All Clear

I reviewed this PR for LLM security vulnerabilities across all six vulnerability classes (Prompt Injection, Data Exfiltration, Secrets/PII in Prompts, Insecure Output Handling, Excessive Agency, and Jailbreak Risks). The PR adds a test file with a traditional command injection vulnerability, but contains no LLM-related code, AI framework imports, or LLM data flows.

_{Minimum severity threshold: 🟡 Medium | To re-scan after changes, comment @promptfoo-scanner
Learn more}

---

_{Was this helpful?  👍 Yes  |  👎 No}